P.C. & “Sexual Equality”?!

I’ve said this so many times to people who know me, but there is NOTHING wrong with recognizing and admitting that women are different than men. I didn’t say LESS THAN: I said DIFFERENT. In general men and women have different qualities, strengths, weaknesses etc. There are “weaknesses” which men have which are strong points for women. IN GENERAL: I see no point in arguing over rare exceptions which occur here and there. It is VERY important to a healthy self for people to be SELF-AWARE, and one of the biggest motivations for “P.C” is that it DISCOURAGES people from being self-aware by trying to give everyone the false delusion that everyone is or should be the same. Even the quickest examination of the anatomies of men and women will tell even the lamest idiot that men and women are different, and if they are so different on the outside there is quite a good chance they are different on the inside wouldn’t you say? The fact is that women and men are TWO separate HALVES of the WHOLE which is humankind. Women and men are NOT the same: They are in essence opposites. SO, of course if you are a “powers that be” what better way to confuse the s#!t out of people than to mislead them towards thinking that they are all the same? And let me tell you if you don’t already know: Confused people are SO much easier to control and manipulate. And HERE is the way to be a tyrannical dictator in a “democracy”: Simply confuse, control and manipulate the majority of the people into voting in whichever way you want them too(and that is much, much easier to do than most people assume). “Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner”: THAT is why this Country is founded as a REPUBLIC and NOT a “Democracy”.

In Defense of Donald Sterling?

Ok, hear me out?

First of all let me say that I abhor racism of any kind.  Also, I want to be clear ahead of time that I am NOT anti-Semitic in any way.

After hearing TONS of reports and opinions on the “Donald Sterling Tape” and the whirlwind that has been going on around it, I finally listened to the whole thing myself the other night.

What really surprised me the most, is that I think there is some (partly) good news: There is no racist owner in L.A.  That’s right, I really think Donald Sterling may be getting something of a bad rap.

If you listen to the tape CLOSELY, and if you resist the knee-jerk reaction one would normally get when they assume someone is racist:

1. We hear Donald Sterling mention “the culture” he lives in many times.

2. We hear Sterling ask a direct question like, “Do you know how black people are treated in Israel?  They are treated like dogs!  Etc”

3. When his (former apparently) GF asks him if he wants her to change the color of her skin, he is appalled and obviously very upset.  He responds with words like, “How could you say that to me?  You really know how to hurt a person”.

4. He clearly expresses that he has nothing against minorities.

So on one hand he is saying things that suggest he likes and is supportive of minorities, and on the other hand he makes the seemingly contradictory statements that he doesn’t want “black people” on her Instagram and sitting with them at the Clippers games.

AND, he makes definite references alluding to the fact that he gets a lot of criticism from his other friends if and when he or his GF is seen socializing with “minorities” or “black people”.

SO: To me it’s rather clear to see what REALLY is going on here.  Donald Sterling is an older Jewish man.  And not only do I propose that he is NOT racist, but if he is critical of anything he is critical of “the culture”. 

He is not communicating well at all, but what he’s really trying to tell her is essentially: “Black people are treated like dogs in Israel, Jewish people and especially many of the older Jewish people don’t view black people as equals, and so it doesn’t matter what I think of minorities and black people: If me or my GF are seen with them then I will get A LOT of criticism from my older Jewish friends.  And SO it would just be SO much easier for me if you would not have black people and other minorities on your Instagram and sitting with us at the games.”  As I mentioned, that’s not exactly what he said, but at this time I believe that is what he meant.

And none of that above even addresses the fact that he was recorded without his knowledge and that no matter what you think of his words that alone is a massive violation of privacy.  One of the many reasons a person would want privacy is that their words can be misunderstood if they don’t phrase what they mean according to who is hearing the message.

The reason I actually care about an idea as unpopular as “defending” Donald Sterling, is that I become so tired of what I call “one-way tolerance”.  We hear constantly today about tolerating other people, other skin colors, other cultures etc.  Some people are born white, some people are born black: AND some people are born in a different TIME and culture.  Donald Sterling is an older Jewish man who was born probably in the 1930’s, and he and his older friends lived through their most formative years before the Civil Rights Movement.  Does that make it right for them to be bigoted?  No, but where is the tolerance for people who had segregation INGRAINED into them BY the CULTURE when they where forming into adults?  Especially when it comes to older Jewish people in particular, when it is very clear by Sterling’s own statements that many people from Israel and other Jewish people can tend to be particularly segregationist(there are many who talk much of the subject of “Jewish Supremacy”, the idea which many Jewish people have that as “God’s chosen people” everyone else is less than them.  I won’t address that subject here).

So, in SUMMARY:  I propose that Donald Sterling was TRYING to tell his GF that he is “between a rock and a hard place”.  He is an old man who is trying to please everyone: His minority GF, the black people in the NBA, AND his older Jewish friends.   Not only is he NOT actually saying racist things, he is actually criticizing the “culture” which makes it difficult for him to please his minority friends AND his Jewish friends.  He is a frustrated man who just wants everyone to get along, and THAT is why he was worried about her Instagram and who was sitting with them at Clippers games.  

Should he have been stronger, and just said, “You know what I am going to sit with who I want, and to hell with my older Jewish friends!”  Perhaps YES that might have been the truly right thing to do.  But to do that would probably be to cut off almost all of the people he shares a history, a heritage and a religion with. And can we really expect that from a man who probably doesn’t have many of his old friends that are still alive in the first place?

Where is the tolerance for this man and how he grew up?  The culture he grew up in, a culture he was born into and is not personally responsible for?  Can we not agree that while his fears may be dated, that we can understand why? 

Haven’t you ever cared a lot about two different people, and you know that one of those people doesn’t like the other?  And in that situation haven’t you every worried that being seen with one of those people you care a lot about might upset the  other person that you care a lot about?

That I say is what is really going on here.  And this man Donald Sterling is having his character “hung in public” because he cares too much for too many different groups of people.

Perhaps you will listen to the recording again, and share your thoughts afterwards?

Joseph Stalin on 9/11?!

The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamor for such laws if the personal security is threatened.” -Joseph Stalin

Control of Money=Control of Government

“History records that the money-changers[bankers] have used every form of ruse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison

More Dangerous Than Armies

“I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” - Thomas Jefferson

Power Over People

"You only have power over people so long as you don’t take everything away from them. But when you’ve robbed a man of everything, he’s no longer in your power - he’s free again." 
-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

An Unusual Story with a Surprise Twist…

A True Story

A man leased an expensive house, and immediately took out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks.

Six weeks later two bombs went off in the house, separated by an hour.

The house burnt down, and the lessor immediately sued the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately won.

The lessor also got the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.

The expensive house was the World Trade Center, and the man was Larry Silverstein.

International Banksters

“Power from any source tends to create an appetite for additional power… It was almost inevitable that the super rich would one day aspire to control not only their won wealth, but the wealth of the whole world. To achieve this, they were perfectly willing to feed the ambitions of the power hungry political conspirators who were committed to the overthrow of all existing governments and the establishments of a central worldwide dictatorship. ” W Cleon Skousen - author

What Is A “False Flag Operation”?

“False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.”

It’s a very old concept. Throughout history it’s been used many times by groups in power who want more power and control, or who are in fear of losing control. Typically, it’s true purpose is the generate public fear of the group it is blamed on, so that the public willingly accepts more control in the name of “protecting them” from another “attack”. Any of this sound familiar?